jiab suleiman lawsuit

DeBeaudry agreed that it would be logical and responsible to follow up with Dr. Beaghler, but she was unable to locate any evidence of additional contact with Dr. Beaghler. This appeal followed. A trial court's evidentiary rulings are generally reviewed for an abuse of discretion, but preliminary questions of law are reviewed de novo. The first, presumably original, copy did not have the underlining reflected in the above quotation. During the surgery, Dr. Jagannathan was able to confirm that none of the procedures described in Dr. Sabit's operative report had actually been done. SIM argues that it is entitled to JNOV because of the improper admission of the credentialing file. Fax: (313) 565-4989. Next to each of these awards, the verdict form included a notation that said, "+12%." SIM objected on several grounds, including its assertion that the amounts awarded by the jury for past damages included interest within the stated figures. SIM first argues that its credentialing file regarding Dr. Sabit was privileged under both MCL 333.20175(8) and MCL 333.21515 ; thus, it should not have been produced and then admitted as evidence at trial. at 157-158, 908 N.W.2d 319 (vacating judgment on a jury verdict when the trial court restricted questions regarding the genuineness and reliability of key evidence); Miller , 244 Mich.App. See MCL 333.20101 et seq. between Awaisi on behalf of Orthopedic, Melissa El Khoury, and Jiab Suleiman, D.O.). Plaintiff claims that "Dr. Beaghler's letter to SIM was admitted by stipulation, in lieu of the attorneys [sic] traveling to California to attempt to depose him." 15 0 obj Over SIM's objection, Dr. Hyde was also permitted to testify about the reasons for Dr. Sabit's suspension, which he discovered in an opinion issued by the California Court of Appeals in 2015. When asked why he did not inquire about issues other than the purported rule violations, Dr. 20 0 obj The NPI number of this provider is 1598965543 and was assigned on July 2007. 2 ], is therefore DEN IED. When the procedures are not followed, "a party need not demonstrate prejudice arising from a claim of defective jury selection, since the requirement would impose an impossible burden." Additionally, SIM should have assessed Dr. Sabit's application to see if he truthfully disclosed the same issues. Dr. Jagannathan was still hopeful that she would continue to improve. See Mitchell , 321 Mich.App. Only plaintiff's medical malpractice claim against SIM, premised on a negligent-credentialing theory, is at issue in this appeal. Plaintiff's complaint also raised numerous claims against SIM, an ambulatory surgery center that claimed to have "the most highly trained and experienced medical professionals." Thus, we reverse and remand for entry of judgment in favor of SIM. 1962 (c) and (d), common-law fraud, civil conspiracy, payment under mistake At any rate, CMH provided enough information to prompt a reasonably intelligent and prudent administrator to follow up. Article 17 of the Public Health Code generally governs licensing and regulation of health facilities and agencies. endobj Although evidentiary errors are not ordinarily grounds for reversal, such relief is appropriate when "a substantial right of a party is affected and it affirmatively appears that failure to grant relief is inconsistent with substantial justice." , 230 Mich.App. The trial court denied the motion, reasoning that it would not promote judicial economy because the medical malpractice of Drs. Co. of America , 237 Mich.App. endobj Yet there was no evidence that anyone at SIM reached out to Dr. Beaghler or anyone else at CMH again. SIM's credentialing file contained two copies of this letter. Indeed, at a June 30, 2017 hearing on plaintiff's motion to compel (which was granted), counsel for plaintiff stated with regard to the negligent-credentialing claim, "the only way we're going to prove it is by looking at the credentialing file." waiver sent on 6/10/2022, answer due 8/9/2022. A motion for JNOV should be granted when the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, fails to establish a claim as a matter of law. Payment method discover, amex, check, all major credit cards Neighborhood Dr. Kenneth Lock testified that he was the medical director and chair of the medical executive committee at SIM in 2011. Plaintiff moved for a directed verdict against Dr. Sabit, arguing that there had been no defense proffered on his behalf, leaving only plaintiff's uncontroverted evidence regarding his violations of the standard of care and proximate causation. Still University, School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona Class of 1997 Certifications & Licensure MI State License 1999 - 2024 endobj <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Tabs/S/StructParents 14>> Lock's attention to SIM's bylaws regarding summary suspensions, which used the term in a similar manner as Dr. Hyde. SIM argues that this was not an appropriate basis for Dr. Hyde's testimony because Dr. Beaghler's letter was part of the inadmissible credentialing file and, even if the credentialing file had been admissible, the statements in Dr. Beaghler's letter were inadmissible hearsay. endobj (DeNinno, Andrew) (Entered: 06/27/2022), (#16) CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Jiab Suleiman D.O., P.C. At any rate, the only basis for admission of Dr. Beaghler's letter at trial was as part of the credentialing file that should have been excluded from evidence under MCL 333.20175(8) and MCL 333.21515. Woodard v. Custer , 473 Mich. 1, 6, 702 N.W.2d 522 (2005) ; Teal v. Prasad , 283 Mich.App. On May 20, 2011, SIM sent a letter to Dr. Sabit indicating that CMH had raised issues that required further investigation before privileges could be granted. Plaintiff's complaint also raised claims against Dr. Jiab Hasan Suleiman and his practice, Jiab Suleiman, D.O., PC, doing business as Premier Orthopedics. (Eppel, Theodore) (Entered: 07/19/2022), (#19) NOTICE of Appearance by Debra A. Geroux on behalf of Rakesh Ramakrishnan, M.D., P.C., Rakesh Ramakrishnan. In their supplemental briefing, plaintiff argued that the trial court was obligated to ascertain and implement the jury's intent, which was to add 12% precomplaint interest to the amounts awarded for past damages, while SIM argued that it was impossible to harmonize the jury's attempt to award precomplaint interest with its failure to designate which portion of past damages were attributed to the precomplaint time frame. As per our records, the last return (form 5500-SF . Dr. Suleiman was identified as the co-surgeon in the operative report, but he testified at trial that he was only present during the initial dissection of the surgical site and then left to attend his own patients. (Geroux, Debra) (Entered: 07/19/2022), (#18) NOTICE of Appearance by Barrett Young on behalf of Rakesh Ramakrishnan, M.D., P.C., Rakesh Ramakrishnan. View court, arrest, criminal/conviction records, Lawsuits, Liens, Bankruptcies & sex offender status for Jiab Suleiman. Rakesh Ramakrishnan, M.D., P.C. 23 0 obj Phone: (313) 583-3230. SIM therefore asked Dr. Sabit to respond in writing to address that issue. (DeNinno, Andrew) (Entered: 06/13/2022), A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Search for your insurance provider. Damages Chart, #13 Exhibit 12 - New Clear Images, LLC Damages Chart, #14 Exhibit 13 - Biomolecular Integrations, Inc. Generally, medical malpractice claims require expert testimony regarding the appropriate standard of care and causation. (quotation marks and citation omitted; alteration in original). 2:22-CV-12736 | 2022-11-10, U.S. District Courts | Contract | 21 0 obj Because the disclosures in Dr. Beaghler's letter were not offered to prove the truth of those statements, the disclosures were not inadmissible hearsay. Dr. Hyde explained that hospitals commonly provide succinct summaries of information in an initial response to inquiries from other facilities about staff, so the mere fact that Dr. Beaghler did not explain the reasons for the suspension in the May 19, 2011 letter is not conclusive. Rakesh Ramakrishnan, M.D., P.C. , 200 Mich.App. at 256, 865 N.W.2d 908. Lock said, "I'm not sure I understand what summary suspension means." In fact, her continuing back pain left her unable to work throughout most of 2011 through 2014. After conducting an internal investigation of a staff physician following the death of a patient, the defendant hospital suspended the physician's privileges for six months. See Kelly v. Builders Square, Inc. , 465 Mich. 29, 38, 632 N.W.2d 912 (2001). endobj With respect to future damages, the jury also awarded plaintiff $5,000 per year from 2018 to 2055 for noneconomic damages, $18,000 per year from 2018 to 2055 for medical expenses, and $40,000 per year from 2018 to 2039 for loss of earning capacity. It was evident that the foregoing issues were noticed by someone in the credentialing process, as they were underlined in a copy of the letter. In summary, the trial court improperly ordered the production and admission of SIM's credentialing file. By October 2012, Dr. Sabit was falsely reporting in his records that plaintiff had a complete resolution of her symptoms. SIM argued that a fair trial on the negligent-credentialing claim was impossible after the jury had been inundated with harsh criticisms of Dr. Sabit and implications that plaintiff had been left abandoned at SIM, unprotected and abused while she slept under anesthesia. endobj 1 0 obj Lock did not know if he underlined the criticisms in Dr. Beaghler's letter, but explained, "[H]ad I seen a letter like that I would immediately bring it to the Board's attention so that they could deal with it ." Although Dr. SIM filed several postjudgment motions in which it sought a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or, alternatively, a new trial, arguing that (1) the credentialing file regarding Dr. Sabit was privileged and inadmissible; (2) Michigan does not recognize a negligent-credentialing cause of action; (3) Dr. Hyde's testimony was inadmissible and failed to establish negligence and proximate cause because it lacked a sufficient factual basis in record evidence; (4) SIM was denied a fair trial because the court refused to seat a second jury for the negligent-credentialing claim, SIM was not able to participate in voir dire, and the jury was exposed to inadmissible and prejudicial information about Dr. Sabit; (5) the jury's award of future medical expenses was speculative and excessive; (6) the jury's attempt to award precomplaint interest could not be harmonized with its failure to distinguish between precomplaint and postcomplaint damages; and (7) the adverse-inference jury instruction was unsupported by evidence. According to SIM's bylaws, the medical director was responsible for making recommendations to the board of directors regarding all applicants for staff privileges. Unlike MCL 333.20175(8), MCL 333.21515 does not use "health facility or agency" terminology that, by definition, encompasses a freestanding surgical outpatient facility. It also referenced two specific instances in which Dr. Sabit did not render appropriate medical care. SIM's credentialing file regarding Dr. Sabit was protected by a statutory peer-review privilege under MCL 333.20175(8) and MCL 333.21515. Defendants, Surgical Institute of Michigan, LLC, and Surgical Institute of Michigan Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC (collectively, SIM ), appeal as of right a judgment entered in plaintiff's favor following a jury trial in this medical malpractice action. Although SIM produced its credentialing file regarding Dr. Sabit pursuant to the court's order, SIM continued to object to the admissibility of the file. 22 0 obj Plaintiff believed her recovery from the March 24, 2016 surgery progressed as expected. When SIM attempted to renew its argument about the prejudice arising from defending the negligent-credentialing claim after the jury were to find Dr. Sabit professionally negligent, the trial court said, "And the answer to am I going to hold two separate trials with two separate Juries is a resounding no I am not." According to Sabit , the written notice of Dr. Sabit's suspension also "referred to two instances where Sabit allegedly did not render appropriate medical care to patients." See other contact addresses. Dr.. CMH responded with a request for Dr. Sabit to sign a comprehensive release permitting disclosure of information. 4 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Tabs/S/StructParents 9>> EIN for organizations is sometimes also referred to as taxpayer identification number or TIN. The trial court agreed to give an adverse-inference instruction because the evidence showed that SIM asked Dr. Sabit for a written response, acknowledged receipt of a response, and no response was produced with SIM's records. The court agreed that the "+12%" interest notation could be interpreted in more than one way and asked the parties for additional briefing regarding potential conflicts between jury instructions and a verdict form. SIM opposed plaintiff's motions, denying that it removed or destroyed anything from the credentialing file before producing it to plaintiff. She underwent surgery with Dr. Jagannathan on March 24, 2016, and had not been able to return to work since then. Leslie v. Allen-Bradley Co., Inc. , 203 Mich.App. It is undisputed that SIM is a freestanding surgical outpatient facility, as defined by MCL 333.20104(7), and therefore also a health facility or agency under MCL 333.20106(1)(c). " Without the admission of the credentialing file upon which the majority of Dr. Hyde's testimony depended, plaintiff's claim for medical malpractice should not have been submitted to the jury. [Dkt. (Tilden, Nathan) (Entered: 06/08/2022), Docket(#1) COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Dr. Hai questioned why Dr. Beaghler would not have indicated that Dr. Sabit was suspended for patient-safety concerns if that was the true reason. 2023-02-22. 576, 583, 505 N.W.2d 27 (1993). 66, 77, 527 N.W.2d 780 (1994) (concluding that a 911 call was not hearsay when it was offered to show why the police responded to a disturbance). In reaching that conclusion, the Court rejected the plaintiff's contention that the privilege did not extend to materials used in deciding whether to grant staff privileges in the first instance, as opposed to a retrospective review of a past event or issue. And because SIM was a freestanding surgical outpatient facility licensed under a different section of the Public Health Code, MCL 333.1101 et seq. SIM objected to Dr. Hyde's testimony regarding this subject on hearsay, foundation, and relevancy grounds, but the trial court overruled the objections. Damages Chart, Exhibit 10 - Jiab Suleiman D.O., P.C. x\[o~yQ+M6M(vM33| E_dH%Qp83$}OQ{:>|=?::_zG7;GwOS,z>;>=a_8`?q3xp0x'9|Jw{=>~4"*uo#^#LQaIu$5VSbYRxQ DeBeaudry also explained that the National Practitioner Data Bank is a registry where claims against doctors are recorded, and it was used by healthcare facilities to help investigate a doctor's background. (NAhm) (Entered: 07/22/2022), (#20) NOTICE of Appearance by Theodore R. Eppel on behalf of Rakesh Ramakrishnan, M.D., P.C., Rakesh Ramakrishnan. Providers. Id. waiver sent on 6/10/2022, answer due 8/9/2022. Jiab Suleiman, DO PC is a medical group practice located in Canton, MI that specializes in Internal Medicine. ID 797-807); and (3) at step five of the five-step analysis found at 20 C.F.R. Freestanding surgical outpatient facility means a facility, other than the office of a physician, dentist, podiatrist, or other private practice office, offering a surgical procedure and related care that in the opinion of the attending physician can be safely performed without requiring overnight inpatient hospital care. 27 Apr 2023 20:07:35 Dr. John Charles Hyde, II, testified as an expert for plaintiff in credentialing and physician privileges. The goal of statutory interpretation is to give effect to the Legislature's intent, as discerned from the plain language of the statute. Plunkett Cooney (by Robert G. Kamenec ) for defendants Surgical Institute of Michigan, LLC, and Surgical Institute of Michigan Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC. The court also determined that plaintiff was required to prove that Dr. Sabit committed malpractice as part of her negligent-credentialing claim against SIM, plaintiff could not rely on Dr. Sabit's default for that purpose, and SIM was free to dispute Dr. Sabit's malpractice as part of its defense. Thus, Dr. Hyde's testimony about the significance of Dr. Beaghler's disclosures and the steps SIM should have taken in response to the letter was not based on facts in evidence, contrary to MRE 703. This Court found the defendant's position persuasive, agreeing that it was supported by the plain meaning of the statutory privilege. Because that proffer was based on the contents of the inadmissible credentialing file, the trial court should have granted SIM's motion for summary disposition. 3 0 obj Check all background information that MyLife has gathered. Plaintiff testified that, in reality, she felt no improvement. The jury determined that SIM negligently credentialed Dr. Sabit and that the negligent credentialing was a proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries. Plaintiff reported persistent pain after a lumbar fusion performed by Dr. Sabit, but a CT myelogram did not reveal evidence of a lumbar interbody fusion, laminectomy, or placement of an interbody cage at L4-L5. DeBeaudry confirmed that she did not have specific experience in healthcare administration, but she did have a general background in management, nursing, and health sciences. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) (Entered: 06/09/2022), Docket(#8) SUMMONS Issued for *Biomolecular Integrations, Inc., Executive Ambulatory Surgical Center, LLC, Jiab Suleiman D.O., P.C., New Clear Images, LLC, Rakesh Ramakrishnan, M.D., P.C., Rakesh Ramakrishnan, Jiab Suleiman, The Surgical Institute of Michigan, LLC * (DAll) (Entered: 06/09/2022), Docket(#7) STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by ASMI Auto Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent The Allstate Corporation for ASMI Auto Insurance Company. He cleaned . at 162, 369 N.W.2d 826. Under MCL 333.21513, a hospital was required to conduct peer-review activities, and the Court opined that the unambiguous language of the section immediately following MCL 333.21513, i.e., the statutory privilege outlined in MCL 333.21515, constituted a clear expression of the Legislature's intent to preclude "peer review committee records" from disclosure, even in the context of an investigation by the board under other articles of the Public Health Code. <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Tabs/S/StructParents 19>> Dr. (Young, Barrett) (Entered: 07/19/2022), Docket(#17) CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Additional Specialties: Orthopedic Surgery. The second copy included the above underlining added by hand. Before: BOONSTRA, P.J., and CAVANAGH and GADOLA, JJ. at 666-667, 584 N.W.2d 747. The judgment includes detailed calculations of each category of damages, interest, setoffs, and present-value reductions, resulting in a total judgment of $1,284.995.78. Although each of these cases involved hospitals, rather than a freestanding surgical outpatient facility like SIM, the analogous language establishing each health facility or agency's duties is significant. Comm. Serv. <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Tabs/S/StructParents 2>> CONCLUSION. ADDITIONAL LINKS Post Question For This Company Contact Us Regarding Your Company Profile All Companies Named JHS MANAGEMENT, LLC Search All Michigan Companies 350 Granite St., Suite 2204 Braintree, MA 02359 Nathan Tilden Attorney at King, Tilden, McEttrick & Brink, P.C. Nonetheless, as explained above, the credentialing file was inadmissible. See also Westland v. Okopski , 208 Mich.App. Dr. Hyde agreed that Dr. Sabit's National Practitioner Data Bank report was negative in May 2011 and that there were no lawsuits against Dr. Sabit pending in Ventura County at that time. MCR 2.511 sets forth the procedures for jury selection, including the process of exercising challenges for cause or peremptorily. Under the circumstances, we will therefore discuss aspects of the credentialing file in this opinion. Chart of Patients and Treatment Billed to Allstate, #8 Exhibit 7 - Mail and Wire Fraud Chart, #9 Exhibit 8 - Executive Ambulatory Surgical Center, LLC Damages Chart, #10 Exhibit 9 - The Surgical Institute of Michigan, LLC Damages Chart, #11 Exhibit 10 - Jiab Suleiman D.O., P.C. 8 0 obj Other - Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act, Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Executive Ambulatory Surgical Center, LLC, (#22) STIPULATED ORDER Extending time for Defendant Rakesh Ramakrishnan and Defendant Rakesh Ramakrishnan, M.D., P.C. SIM acknowledged that the trial court had already denied a motion in limine from Dr. Suleiman regarding the same issue, but asked it to revisit the issue because MCL 333.20175(8) provided a statutory privilege protecting credentialing files from use at trial. Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) - 18 USC 1961-1968, Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Executive Ambulatory Surgical Center, LLC et al, (#13) WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Nearly a decade later, this Court considered the statutory privilege in the context of a medical malpractice action involving a negligent-credentialing theory. Evidentiary rulings are generally reviewed for an abuse of discretion, Mueller , 323 Mich.App. The opinion confirmed Dr. Hyde's suspicions about Dr. Beaghler's disclosures and demonstrated that more information was available well before SIM granted Dr. Sabit privileges. More Info Extra Phones. Damages Chart, #15 Civil Action Cover Sheet, #16 Proposed Summonses) (DeNinno, Andrew) (Entered: 06/08/2022). Dr. Jiab Suleiman has 17+ years of experience in orthopedic surgery. About Dr. Suleiman Bio Bynum v. ESAB Group, Inc. , 467 Mich. 280, 283, 651 N.W.2d 383 (2002). Lock explained that "credentialing packet[s]" were processed and given to the board of directors for decision. at 667, 673, 584 N.W.2d 747. Dr. Sabit reported that he previously had staff privileges at CMH, so a reference request was sent there. Chart of Patients and Treatment Billed to Allstate, #6 Exhibit 5 - New Clear Images, LLC Chart of Patients and Treatment Billed to Allstate, #7 Exhibit 6 - Biomolecular Integrations, Inc. The improper admission of his expert opinion without a sufficient factual basis in record evidence affected SIM's substantial rights, and affirming a verdict and judgment premised largely on inadmissible evidence would be inconsistent with substantial justice. Licenses and Affiliations Education Jiab Suleiman, DO earned a degree of a Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine. Generally, a party that has taken a legal position and prevailed in an earlier proceeding may not assert a contrary position in the same or related litigation. Before: Boonstra, P.J., and Cavanagh and Gadola, JJ. endobj Unambiguous statutory language must be enforced as written and no judicial construction is required or permitted. 485, 498, 566 N.W.2d 671 (1997) (holding that, because the trial court struck the testimony of the plaintiff's two experts regarding her liver disorder, plaintiff was left "with no evidence of causation" and "could not establish a prima facie case" with regard to that disorder; the trial court therefore correctly granted summary disposition to defendants regarding those claims). Plaintiff opined that she was entitled to $630,431.04 in present damages, and $1,691,000 in future damages reduced to a present value of $1,038.540.74, for a total award of $1,668.971.78, less any expenses paid or payable by a collateral source, namely, the Social Security Administration. Plaintiff's counsel drew Dr. Lock's explanations about various pieces of information that were not appropriately acted upon made it clear that he did not know the credentialing process. The trial court ruled that SIM could be held jointly and severally liable if plaintiff obtained a verdict against Dr. Sabit, but only with respect to a malpractice claim. Other than Dr. Beaghler's letter, there was nothing negative in Dr. Sabit's file, and SIM was also aware that Dr. Sabit had been given privileges at several hospitals in the area. 4 at 28.] As evidence that SIM performed its due diligence, Dr. Hai continued to emphasize that other facilities cleared Dr. Sabit for privileges as well and the state of Michigan granted Dr. Sabit a license. Indeed, SIM filed a pretrial motion for summary disposition with respect to plaintiff's negligent-credentialing claim. According to Dr. Hyde, several of Dr. Beaghler's disclosures were very alarming and required further scrutiny, including that (1) Dr. Sabit was on provisional status at the time of his resignation; (2) Dr. Sabit did not always comply with medical staff bylaws, rules, regulations, and other policies; (3) action was taken against Dr. Sabit's clinical privileges in the form of a brief summary suspension which generally occurs when there are patient-safety concerns; (4) after Dr. Sabit resigned, his practice was the subject of a focus review which generally means the hospital had concerns for patient safety; and (5) ongoing professional practice evaluations revealed several concerns regarding Dr. Sabit. We will check for: The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) (Entered: 06/09/2022), (#8) SUMMONS Issued for *Biomolecular Integrations, Inc., Executive Ambulatory Surgical Center, LLC, Jiab Suleiman D.O., P.C., New Clear Images, LLC, Rakesh Ramakrishnan, M.D., P.C., Rakesh Ramakrishnan, Jiab Suleiman, The Surgical Institute of Michigan, LLC * (DAll) (Entered: 06/09/2022), (#7) STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by ASMI Auto Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent The Allstate Corporation for ASMI Auto Insurance Company. In short, he Allstate removed the action from the Third Judicial Circuit in Wayne County, Michigan, to this Court on . New Clear Images, LLC, Rakesh Ramakrishnan, M.D., P.C., Rakesh Ramakrishnan, Jiab Suleiman, The Surgical Institute of Michigan, LLC * (DAll) June 9, 2022 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C.
Billionaire Butte, Mission Creek, Dry Fixation And Wet Fixation In Cytology, Clou De Girofle Pour Faire Revenir Son Ex, Parmentier Potatoes Mary Berry, Articles J